tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post9005866342503196137..comments2011-02-07T17:41:08.768-05:00Matt Bishoffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03035092759366321726noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-31839540098936820662010-12-21T00:36:03.187-05:002010-12-21T00:36:03.187-05:00отличный сайт!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-60692139991570882152010-02-13T19:28:05.693-05:002010-02-13T19:28:05.693-05:00It&#39;s so easy to choose high quality [url=http://www.euroreplicawatches.com/]replica watches[/url] online: [url=http://www.euroreplicawatches.com/mens-swiss-watches-rolex/]Rolex replica[/url], [url=http://www.euroreplicawatches.com/mens-swiss-watches-breitling/]Breitling replica[/url], Chanel replica or any other watch from the widest variety of models and brands.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-57316718533330377272010-02-12T19:18:48.399-05:002010-02-12T19:18:48.399-05:00Yes if the truth be known, in some moments I can reveal that I agree with you, but you may be considering other options.<br />to the article there is still a without question as you did in the fall issue of this beg <a href="http://www.google.com/ie?as_q=md5" rel="nofollow">www.google.com/ie?as_q=</a><a href="http://mohave-valley14.freehostia.com/2010-02-17.html" rel="nofollow">biorythms plus 2008 1.0.0.premium</a> ?<br />I noticed the utter you have not used. Or you use the dreary methods of inspiriting of the resource. I suffer with a week and do necheg<br />Your Ferrdenants :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-43889176499737128872008-03-19T05:13:00.000-04:002008-03-19T05:13:00.000-04:00Look for the Reds to do better. Second place definitely, if not first. I'm a Cubs fan, but I don't believe they have the depth or talent of the Reds.thewritersjourneyhttp://thewritersjourney.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-35817314652387814402008-03-15T19:34:00.000-04:002008-03-15T19:34:00.000-04:00To Chad,<BR/><BR/>Actually, in the article I wrote that Milwaukee was the sexy pick LAST season, not this year. And I agree that the division was theirs to lose last year, but injuries and Capuano being terrible kind of ruined them down the stretch.<BR/><BR/>To Cincy fan,<BR/><BR/>You have to admit that the Reds' rotation is far from perfect. Provided that Harang remains the same and Arroyo has a bounce-back great year, there's a big drop-off after that. Bailey has loads of talent but is not proven at all, and you can't really trust spring performances of the other guys to carry over into the season. I'm not saying that the rotation will be terrible, but you can't say that it's great. I think it would be great if this rotation surprised everybody, because I think it will make the central division race that much more fun to watch. But as it stands, there are question marks.Matt Wilsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17764491253985774755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-36210844496661083682008-03-12T17:42:00.000-04:002008-03-12T17:42:00.000-04:00Don't discount the Reds to take the division this year. While this NL central preview is quite good, it's assessment of the Reds staff is underwhelming. I can't say I blame them, given recent history, but I in particular take issue with the characterization of Bronson Arroyo's 2007. He started off quite poorly, but by the end of the season his ERA was below 4 and a 1/2 and he gave the Reds over 200 innings. These aren't superb numbers, but frankly with GABP and teh Reds offense, they're good enough to win now that the back end of the bullpen has been shored up. Also, the editor's note was quite necessary, as Cueto and Volquez have looked phenomenal so far this spring, with Bailey, still a 21 year-old, showing promiseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-36456944335007967862008-03-11T14:38:00.000-04:002008-03-11T14:38:00.000-04:00How can you say the Brewers are everyone's sexy pick to win the Central when just about EVERY prediction has the Cubs win the Central???<BR/><BR/>Why is it that so many predictions look like last year's final standings? There are always surprises every year, yet there is a notable absence of anyone going out on any limbs in their predictions.<BR/><BR/>The Brewers will win the Central. They should have won it last year if not for inexperience and running out of steam in August/September. That won't be the case this year.Chadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15092808939877990425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-5535222275598026012008-03-11T08:14:00.000-04:002008-03-11T08:14:00.000-04:00Good Job. Personally, I really think the Reds have the ability to surprise some people and the Brewers and Cubs are set up to disappoint.Deanerhttp://blue-collarbaseball.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091338249780921196.post-80649100978254633472008-03-10T19:53:00.000-04:002008-03-10T19:53:00.000-04:00Would have to say this is the best NL Central preview I have read yet. I am a huge Astro fan, but I am realistic and I think 3rd place is about right. I am hoping for a better year out of our pitching staff than expected and think Oswalt, Backe, and Rodriguez will be ok, it's Woody, Chacon,etc. that worry me. I do agree that offensively we will be much tougher than last year, our bullpen should be good to, and look out sometime this year for Paulino and Gervacio to step into our pitching staff.mitch4yahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07222989473123150857noreply@blogger.com